Speaker summary
59%1 analyzed article/video190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Bevan results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 83.5 hits. Analysis detected 471 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (18,028 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Bevan is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Tom Bevan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 190
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos190 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.6%37.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos