Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video32.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Barrett results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75.9% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,475 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Barrett is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Tom Barrett
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 32.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
64.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos32.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 61.1%61.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 75.9%75.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.1%61.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 61.1%61.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 75.9%, sitewide 26.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 61.1%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 61.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos