Speaker summary
⁠82%3 analyzed articles/videos130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Chretien results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 528.515 faulty-reasoning hits from 130 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (14,443 of 25,875 speakers). This Todd Chretien is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Todd Chretien
Speaker details
Total words: 130
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
27.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos130 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.0%60.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 41.1%41.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.8%43.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.8%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 41.1%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos