Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video32.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tish Taylor results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 77.6% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 111.573 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,991 of 28,364 speakers). This Tish Taylor is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Tish Taylor
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 32.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
44.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos32.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 77.6%77.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 66.4%66.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 77.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 66.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 2.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos