Speaker summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tina Fey results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,289 of 28,364 speakers). This Tina Fey is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Tina Fey
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
58.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos