Speaker summary
56%2 analyzed articles/videos165.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Whitehouse results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 53% saturation with 98.625 hits. Analysis detected 551.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 165.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (19,527 of 28,071 speakers). This Tim Whitehouse is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Tim Whitehouse
Speaker details
Total words: 165.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
19.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos165.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 53.0%53.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 18.6%18.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.5%12.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 53.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Composition/Division: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate