Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video142.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Palazzo results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 45 faulty-reasoning hits from 142.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,547 of 28,364 speakers). This Tim Palazzo is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Tim Palazzo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 142.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
23.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos142.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.1%21.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos