Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Armstrong results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 231 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,335 of 28,364 speakers). This Tim Armstrong is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Tim Armstrong
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.7% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos