Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video329.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Till Sawala results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Appeal to Emotion, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 71.194 hits. Analysis detected 580.548 faulty-reasoning hits from 329.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,404 of 28,364 speakers). This Till Sawala is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Till Sawala
Speaker details
Total words: 329.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751003.4% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos329.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 5.7%5.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos