Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Howlett results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 223 hits . Analysis detected 2,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (5,003 of 6,628 authors). This Joseph Howlett is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Joseph Howlett
Author details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst