Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These THR results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Recency Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,152 of 28,364 speakers). This THR is worse (more manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group.
THR
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 44.7%44.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.7%44.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 3.3%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos