Speaker summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thorgerdur Palsdottir results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 119.587 hits . Analysis detected 967.426 faulty-reasoning hits from 471 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,682 of 28,364 speakers). This Thorgerdur Palsdottir is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Thorgerdur Palsdottir
Speaker details
Total words: 471
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos471 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 25.4% 25.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 20.2% 20.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.6% 20.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst