Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Schiller results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,241 of 28,364 speakers). This Thomas Schiller is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Thomas Schiller
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
49.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 73.6%73.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 60.4%60.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 60.4%60.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 30.2%30.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.2%30.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 73.6%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos