Speaker summary
⁠57%4 analyzed articles/videos176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas March Bell results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 54.6% saturation with 123.142 hits. Analysis detected 438.142 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 16% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,458 of 28,364 speakers). This Thomas March Bell is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Thomas March Bell
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
16.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos176 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 54.6%54.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 54.6%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos