Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Maier results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 32.625 hits. Analysis detected 119.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,532 of 28,364 speakers). This Thomas Maier is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Thomas Maier
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos