Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Mayerowitz results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 857 hits . Analysis detected 2,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,402 of 6,628 authors). This Scott Mayerowitz is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Scott Mayerowitz
Author details
Total words: 3,920
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 21.9% 21.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 21.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst