Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video81.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theresa results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 68.9% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 289 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,513 of 28,364 speakers). This Theresa is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Theresa
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 81.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.3% percentile
28.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos81.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 68.8%68.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 68.8%68.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 68.8%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 68.8%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos