Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thea Riofrancos results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Confirmation Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 58% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,323 of 28,364 speakers). This Thea Riofrancos is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Thea Riofrancos
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠75%Thea Riofrancos (selected)58%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
58.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos100 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 58.0%58.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 58.0%, sitewide 7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos