Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Boston Atlas results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 305 faulty-reasoning hits from 122 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,477 of 28,364 speakers). This The Boston Atlas is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
The Boston Atlas
Speaker details
Total words: 122
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos122 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.8%23.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos