Author summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 1,571 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Finkelman results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 592 hits . Analysis detected 5,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,713 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,170 of 6,572 authors). This Paul Finkelman is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Paul Finkelman
Author details
Total words: 4,713
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.6% 12.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst