Speaker summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos39.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Republicans results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Ad Hominem, and Unattributed Quote, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 76% saturation with 30.005 hits. Analysis detected 214.01 faulty-reasoning hits from 39.5 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 56% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,548 of 28,364 speakers). This Texas Republicans is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Texas Republicans
Speaker details
Total words: 39.5
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
56.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos39.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 76.0%76.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 76.0%76.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 48.1%48.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Speaker 76.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos