Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terri Barbera results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Red Herring, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 402 faulty-reasoning hits from 200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (20,959 of 27,011 speakers). This Terri Barbera is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Terri Barbera
Speaker details
Total words: 200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
15.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos200 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Red Herring: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Red HerringSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos