Speaker summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 838.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teri Carlyle results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Loss Aversion , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 76 hits . Analysis detected 501.959 faulty-reasoning hits from 838.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,844 of 28,364 speakers). This Teri Carlyle is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Teri Carlyle
Speaker details
Total words: 838.5
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos838.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst