Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Noah Sheidlower results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 192 hits . Analysis detected 1,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,997 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Noah Sheidlower is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Noah Sheidlower
Author details
Total words: 2,997
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Straw Man: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst