Speaker summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teresa Mosqueda results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 47% saturation with 117 hits . Analysis detected 782.698 faulty-reasoning hits from 149 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (17,651 of 28,364 speakers). This Teresa Mosqueda is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Teresa Mosqueda
Speaker details
Total words: 149
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 23.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos149 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 64.9% 64.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 50.3% 50.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 47.0% 47.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 55.7% 55.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 37.3% 37.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 36.8% 36.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Ad Hominem: Speaker 64.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.7%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 47.0%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 36.8%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst