Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terence Bennett results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43.5 hits. Analysis detected 134.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,983 of 28,364 speakers). This Terence Bennett is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Terence Bennett
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos