Speaker summary
42% 1 analyzed article/video 203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tenesha Hatter results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 75 hits . Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 203 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,434 of 28,364 speakers). This Tenesha Hatter is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Tenesha Hatter
Speaker details
Total words: 203
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 9.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos203 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Anecdotal: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst