Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video137.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teesta Setalvad results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Burden of Proof, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 82.875 hits. Analysis detected 323.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 137.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,225 of 28,364 speakers). This Teesta Setalvad is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Teesta Setalvad
Speaker details
Total words: 137.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510039.3% percentile
24.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos137.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 53.6%53.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.0%17.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 53.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos