Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video89 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Docks results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 68.5% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 237 faulty-reasoning hits from 89 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,978 of 28,364 speakers). This Ted Docks is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Ted Docks
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 89
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
44.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos89 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 68.5%68.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.1%55.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.1%37.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 68.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos