Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video63.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Anderson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Primacy Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 66.3% saturation with 47.707 hits. Analysis detected 141.76 faulty-reasoning hits from 63.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,271 of 28,364 speakers). This Taylor Anderson is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Taylor Anderson
Speaker details
Total words: 63.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
34.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos63.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 66.3%66.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 36.7%36.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 66.3%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 36.7%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos