Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video199.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tayefur Rahman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 199.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (26,035 of 28,364 speakers). This Tayefur Rahman is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
Tayefur Rahman
Speaker details
Total words: 199.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.2% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos199.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.9%12.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos