Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video318.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taulby Roach results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 49.1% saturation with 175.875 hits. Analysis detected 912 faulty-reasoning hits from 318.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,587 of 28,364 speakers). This Taulby Roach is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Taulby Roach
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 318.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos318.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 49.1%49.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.9%16.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos