Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tass news agency results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 69.6% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 39 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 69.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,892 of 28,364 speakers). This Tass news agency is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Tass news agency
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
69.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 69.6%69.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 69.6%, sitewide 26.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos