Speaker summary
87% 2 analyzed articles/videos 208.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tascha Van Auken results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 100.111 hits . Analysis detected 636.398 faulty-reasoning hits from 208.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (18,372 of 28,364 speakers). This Tascha Van Auken is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Tascha Van Auken
Speaker details
Total words: 208.5
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 21.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos208.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 48.0% 48.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 44.7% 44.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 34.8% 34.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.6% 29.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 24.1% 24.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Indoctrination: Speaker 48.0%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst