Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tarik Abou-Chadi results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 145 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,811 of 28,364 speakers). This Tarik Abou-Chadi is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Tarik Abou-Chadi
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos