Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tanya de Grunwald results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 290 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (4,143 of 28,364 speakers). This Tanya de Grunwald is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Tanya de Grunwald
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠86%Tanya de Grunwald (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510085.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos