Speaker summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos31.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tammy Baldwin results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,065 of 28,364 speakers). This Tammy Baldwin is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Tammy Baldwin
Speaker details
Total words: 31.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
22.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos31.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos