Speaker summary
⁠28%3 analyzed articles/videos169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tamika Smith results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 169 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,111 of 28,364 speakers). This Tamika Smith is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Tamika Smith
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 169
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.1% percentile
18.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos169 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 31.2%31.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 31.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos