Author summary
23% 1 analyzed article/video 567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kayla Hewitt results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 970 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,701 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,646 of 6,628 authors). This Kayla Hewitt is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Kayla Hewitt
Author details
Total words: 1,701
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.9%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst