Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Takemi Murai results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,584 of 28,364 speakers). This Takemi Murai is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Takemi Murai
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
15.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos