Speaker summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 907.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tad Devine results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 173.24 hits . Analysis detected 2,306.267 faulty-reasoning hits from 907.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,497 of 28,364 speakers). This Tad Devine is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Tad Devine
Speaker details
Total words: 907.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos907.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst