Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Surfshark results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 57.1% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 51 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,736 of 28,364 speakers). This Surfshark is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Surfshark
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.0% percentile
30.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 57.1%57.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 57.1%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos