Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Superior Court of California, County of Humboldt results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 73.1% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 419 faulty-reasoning hits from 167 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,386 of 28,364 speakers). This Superior Court of California, County of Humboldt is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Superior Court of California, County of Humboldt
Speaker details
Total words: 167
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
31.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos167 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 73.0%73.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.3%35.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 73.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos