Speaker summary
⁠83%3 analyzed articles/videos319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sundar Pichai results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 186.126 hits. Analysis detected 530.783 faulty-reasoning hits from 319 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,549 of 28,364 speakers). This Sundar Pichai is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Sundar Pichai
Speaker details
Total words: 319
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
17.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos319 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 58.4%58.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 58.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos