Speaker summary
71% 4 analyzed articles/videos 434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sumathy Kumar results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 203.952 hits . Analysis detected 1,235.176 faulty-reasoning hits from 434 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,008 of 27,612 speakers). This Sumathy Kumar is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Sumathy Kumar
Speaker details
Total words: 434
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 7.2% BS Score4 analyzed videos434 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 32.9% 32.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 18.4% 18.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Indoctrination: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Tu Quoque: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst