Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Wasserman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Slippery Slope, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 89 faulty-reasoning hits from 115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,746 of 28,273 speakers). This Steven Wasserman is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Steven Wasserman
Speaker details
Total words: 115
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
19.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos115 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.1%20.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Slippery Slope: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos