Speaker summary
⁠45%3 analyzed articles/videos190.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Johnson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 468 faulty-reasoning hits from 190.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,683 of 28,364 speakers). This Steven Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Steven Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 190.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
27.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos190.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos