Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video94.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven J. Kelly results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 88.2% saturation with 83.395 hits. Analysis detected 235.395 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (10,601 of 38,479 speakers). This Steven J. Kelly is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Steven J. Kelly
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠73%Steven J. Kelly (selected)51%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 94.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 88.3%88.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.1%22.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 88.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos