Author summary
27% 1 analyzed article/video 620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Mulvaney results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 1,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,655 of 8,404 authors). This Katie Mulvaney is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Katie Mulvaney
Author details
Total words: 2,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst