Author summary
27%1 analyzed article/video620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Mulvaney results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,655 of 8,404 authors). This Katie Mulvaney is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Katie Mulvaney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
69%Katie Mulvaney (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,480
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos