Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Rhoads results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.7% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 290.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,655 of 28,105 speakers). This Steve Rhoads is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Steve Rhoads
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
25.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.4%50.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.8%50.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.4%28.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 29.5%29.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.8%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Tu Quoque: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos